Nathaniel Singleton v. Warden Rivera

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7085
NATHANIEL SINGLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN RIVERA; ASSOCIATE WARDEN WEIR; ASSIST WITTMAN; DR.
PHILLIPES; COMMANDER GLENN; COMMANDER BRADY; MR. AGRLINE; D.
COUICK; OFFICER MS. VENTON; OFFICER MS. JOHNSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-01909-RBH)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Singleton v. Warden Rivera, No. 1:10-cv-01909-RBH
(D.S.C. June 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2