Maria Castillo v. Merrick Garland

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1663 Doc: 19 Filed: 10/03/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1663
MARIA ESTELA CASTILLO; A.P.C.,
Petitioners,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: August 29, 2022 Decided: October 3, 2022
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Luis C. Diaz, LAW OFFICES OF LUIS C. DIAZ, LLC, Silver Spring,
Maryland, for Petitioners. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony P.
Nicastro, Assistant Director, Yanal H. Yousef, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil
Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1663 Doc: 19 Filed: 10/03/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Maria Estela Castillo and her minor son, A.P.C., both natives and citizens of El
Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
denying as untimely their motion to reopen and declining to apply equitable tolling. Based
on our review of the record, we are satisfied that the Board did not abuse its discretion in
denying reopening. See Lawrence v. Lynch, 826 F.3d 198, 203 (4th Cir. 2016) (explaining
standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board. In re Castillo (B.I.A. May 10, 2021). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2