Renshaw v. Feely

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7185
ROGER DEAN RENSHAW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES FEELY, M.D.; RON ANGELONE, Director,
Department of Corrections; STERLING PROFFITT,
Superintendent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
(CA-96-615)
Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997
Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Dean Renshaw, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion. We affirm, in part, on the rea-
soning of the district court, Renshaw v. Feely, No. CA-96-615 (W.D.
Va. July 25, 1996), and because Renshaw failed to show that Appel-
lees acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical
needs. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2