United States v. McKenzie

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6038
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ALEXANDER SHERMAN MCKENZIE,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:97-cr-00203-MR-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 5, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Sherman McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard
Ascik, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Sherman McKenzie appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for relief from his criminal
judgment, his motion for appointment of counsel, and his 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to modify term of
imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. McKenzie, No. 1:97-cr-
00203-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2