Locklear v. Harrison

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6487
TIMMIE RUSSELL LOCKLEAR,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HOPE HARRISON; NURSE PADGETT; NICKOLUS D. VAUG; PAULA SMITH,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:08-ct-03132-H)
Submitted: September 28, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timmie Russell Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Timmie Russell Locklear appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny
Locklear’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Locklear v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03132-H (E.D.N.C. March 11,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2