Scott v. Hudgins

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6051
JOEY D. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FNU HUDGINS, Sergeant; MATTHEW PENNELL; KEITH WHITENER; BOYD
BENNETT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00137-GCM)
Submitted: July 20, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joey D. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joey D. Scott appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint alleging
excessive force. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Scott v. Hudgins, No. 5:08-cv-00137-GCM
(W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2008). We deny all Scott’s pending motions,
including his motions for appointment of counsel, to “Dismiss
PLRA Procedure,” to compel discovery, to continue
videoconference hearing, for seizure of property/assets, and to
impose sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2