United States v. Rouse

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7745
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY K. ROUSE,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief
District Judge. (3:01-cr-00015-jpj-2)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 21, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony K. Rouse, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony K. Rouse appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2009). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Rouse, No. 3:01-cr-00015-jpj-2 (W.D. Va. Sept.
4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2