DocketNumber: 96-7693
Filed Date: 7/31/1997
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7693 REGINALD CURBEAM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EUGENE M. NUTH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William N. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-95-2554-WMN) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: July 31, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Curbeam, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under28 U.S.C. § 2254
(1994) (current version at28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. Curbeam v. Nuth, No. CA-95-2554-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 26, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___,1997 WL 338568
(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2