Montgomery v. Ewend

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6055
SHERMAN CLAYTON MONTGOMERY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MATTHEW G. EWEND, Neuro-Surgeon at UNC-Chapel
Hill, North Carolina,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
District Judge. (CA-05-673-5)
Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 24, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherman Clayton Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Sherman Clayton Montgomery appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Montgomery v. Ewend, No. CA-05-673-5
(E.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -