David Laux v. Board of Supervisors

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1018
DAVID J. LAUX; TARA K. LAUX, a/k/a Tara K. Long,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; JAMES W.
PATTERSON, Director, Fairfax County Department of Public
Works and Environmental Services,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-01334-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: June 2, 2016 Decided: June 10, 2016
Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David J. Laux, Tara K. Laux, Appellants Pro Se. David P.
Bobzien, County Attorney, Cynthia A. Bailey Deputy County
Attorney, Christopher A. Costa, Sara G. Silverman, Assistant
County Attorneys, FAIRFAX COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
David J. Laux and Tara K. Laux appeal the district court’s
order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss their 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the
record and the contentions on appeal and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Laux
v. Bd. Of Supervisors of Fairfax Cty. Va., No. 1:15-cv-01334-
LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2015); see Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co.,
263 U.S. 413 (1923); Dist. of Columbia Ct. of App. v. Feldman,
460 U.S. 462 (1983). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3