In re: Robinson v.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7331
In Re: RESTONEY ROBINSON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(CA-93-381-MU, CA-94-196-MU)
Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Restoney Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Restoney Robinson has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in
this court to recuse a particular district court judge from pre-
siding over his actions in the Western District of North Carolina
on the grounds of bias. Because we find no merit to the claims, we
deny the petition.
Bias must be extrajudicial to warrant recusal. A judge's bias
must be personal and not arise out of the litigation. In re Beard,
811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). Recusal is not required merely
because a judge is familiar with a case due to his judicial in-
volvement with prior proceedings. Id. Robinson presents no evidence
to substantiate his claims that the judge's adverse rulings against
him were based on race.
For these reasons, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2