Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6046
DAVID L. REYNOLDS,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ)
Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 29, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David L. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David L. Reynolds appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia, No.
1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009). Additionally,
we deny as unnecessary Reynolds’ motion for a certificate of
appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2