Gregory Camden v. AMSEC Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1185
GREGORY E. CAMDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMSEC CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00554-AWA-FBS)
Submitted: October 10, 2012 Decided: October 26, 2012
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory E. Camden, MONTAGNA KLEIN CAMDEN LLP, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellant. Michael W. Thomas, THOMAS, QUINN & KRIEGER, LLP,
San Francisco, California, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Edward Camden appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil complaint in which he sought
enforcement of attorney’s fee orders issued in a proceeding
under the Longshore and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act, 33
U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Camden v. AMSEC Corp., No. 2:11-
cv-00554-AWA-FBS (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 2012). We grant Appellee’s
motion to reactivate the stayed appeal, and deny Camden’s motion
seeking judgment approving settlement of the parties. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2