United States v. Dixon

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7335
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HERBERT PERRY DIXON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-93-153, CA-96-36)
Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Perry Dixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael James Cummings,
COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Dixon, Nos. CR-93-153; CA-96-36 (E.D. Va.
May 3, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
AFFIRMED
2