United States v. Johnson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6612
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
THEODORE ROOSEVELT JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-50, CA-98-252-1, CA-97-1097-1)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Theodore Roosevelt Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Theodore Roosevelt Johnson seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-92-50;
CA-98-252-1; CA-97-1097-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 1999). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2