Wu v. Gonzales

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1886
YI LAN WU; D.C.,
Petitioners,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A97-485-933; A97-485-934)
Submitted: August 16, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Yi Lan Wu; D.C., Petitioners Pro Se. James Arthur Hunolt, Carol
Federighi, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Tracey Wood, Eric Warren
Marsteller, Michelle Gorden Latour, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Yi Lan Wu and her son, D.C., natives and citizens of the
People’s Republic of China, petition for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to
reconsider its previous order, which dismissed as untimely their
appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of their requests for
asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention
Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order
and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v.
Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review. See In re: Wu, Nos. A97-485-933; A97-485-
934 (B.I.A. July 20, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -