Scinto v. Preston

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6058
PAUL SCINTO, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDWARD GLENN PRESTON; RALPH MELTON, JR.; FRANK POLUMBO; ERIC
WING; THE CITY OF NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA; ESTATE OF BRIAN
LEMAY,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
E&J AUTOMOTIVE, et al.; BRIAN LEMAY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:03-cv-00178-H)
Submitted: July 20, 2010 Decided: August 12, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Scinto, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James Carlton Thornton,
PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; W.
Walton Kitchin, Jr., COLOMBO, KITCHIN, JOHNSON, DUNN & BALL,
LLP, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Paul Scinto, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Scinto v. Preston, No. 4:03-cv-00178-H (E.D.N.C. May 28
& Dec. 11, 2009). We grant Scinto’s motion to exceed length
limitations for his informal brief. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2