Walling v. State Accident Fund

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1259
RIDDICK WALLING, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE STATE ACCIDENT FUND; PETER LEVENTIS; KRISTEN KIMENY, State
Accident Funds Adjuster; JACKIE WILLIAMS, State Accident Funds
Adjuster; MARION TRYON FACE, State Accident Funds Adjuster;
S. LEANNE MCCORMACK, State Accident Funds Adjuster; WILLIAM
SHIPLEY, State Accident Funds Adjuster; LANCE SIMS, State
Accident Funds Adjuster; EDWARD TAVEL, State Accident Funds
Adjuster; JOSEPH EDWARD NOLAND, State Accident Funds Adjuster;
DANIAL NEMETH, State Accident Funds Adjuster; LOUIS F. PLZAK,
State Accident Funds Adjuster; JOSEPH P. TOBIN, State Accident
Funds Adjuster; DAVID BROSMAN, State Accident Funds Adjuster;
THOMAS BUD DUC, State Accident Funds Adjuster; MICHELLE
BECKNELL, State Accident Funds Adjuster; AVERY B. WILKERSON,
JR., State Accident Funds Adjuster; GENE MCCASKILL, State
Accident Funds Adjuster; DYANA LOWNDES-ROSEN, State Accident
Funds Adjuster,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:15-cv-04448-DCN)
Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 22, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Riddick Walling, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Riddick Walling, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Walling’s
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Walling has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th
Cir. 2014) (noting court’s review is limited to issues preserved
in informal brief); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430
n.4 (4th Cir. 2004) (deeming abandoned issue not raised in brief).
We also find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny
all outstanding motions, and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Walling v. The State Accident Fund,
No. 2:15-cv-04448-DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2016). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3