Oliver v. Taylor

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6663
DAN OLIVER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN TAYLOR, Warden; LIEUTENANT WILMOUTH, Unit
Manager; T. FOWLKES, Ombudman,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-01-221-AM)
Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 30, 2001
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dan Oliver, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Dan Oliver appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the
district court. To the extent that Oliver asserts a claim of
retaliation, we find that he failed to show an actual injury.
Adams v. Rice, 40 F.3d 72, 74-75 (4th Cir. 1994); ACLU of Maryland,
Inc. v. Wicomico County, 999 F.2d 780, 785 (4th Cir. 1993). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2