Abedin v. Gonzales

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1116
AHSAN UL ABEDIN,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A72-167-540)
Submitted: August 26, 2005 Decided: October 20, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andres Cayetano Benach, MAGGIO & KATTAR, Washington, D.C., for
Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M.
Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Daniel E. Goldman,
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ahsan Ul Abedin, a native and citizen of Bangladesh,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) affirming, without opinion, the immigration
judge’s order denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings.
We have reviewed the record and the immigration judge’s order and
find that the immigration judge did not abuse his discretion in
concluding that Abedin failed to establish that counsel rendered
ineffective assistance. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24
(1992) (setting forth standard of review). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -