Beatty v. Shiloh

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7667
JERRY BEATTY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STEPHEN M. SHILOH, General Manager; LAWFORD R.
BELL, Operations Manager; ROBERT BECK; UNKNOWN
AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES OF STATE USE INDUSTRIES;
UNKNOWN AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES OF MARYLAND
DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-04-481-WMN)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 15, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Beatty, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
General, Phillip Michael Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Beatty appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Beatty v. Shiloh, No. CA-04-481-WMN (D.
Md. June 8, 2004; Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -