Moore v. Kerenick

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1193
SAMUEL R. MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH F. KERENICK, in his capacity as Mana-
ger, Employee Relations for the State Board
for Technical and Comprehensive Education,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CA-97-1352-3-19BC)
Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel R. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Pharr Pearson, Nicole
Paul Cantey, ELLZEY & BROOKS, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Samuel R. Moore appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to the defendant in his action under the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-634 (West 1994
& Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recom-
mendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Kerenick, No.
CA-97-1352-3-19BC (D.S.C. Jan. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2