Mingo v. Dove

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7678
HUGH MINGO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DAN L. DOVE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-01-2764-2-18AJ)
Submitted: November 28, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hugh Mingo, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Hugh Mingo appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mingo v.
Dove, No. CA-01-2764-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2