Hinton v. MD State Dept Corr

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7925
HOWARD JEROME HINTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-05-
1809-AMD)
Submitted: March 15, 2006 Decided: March 24, 2006
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howard Jerome Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Sheldon Oakley,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Howard Jerome Hinton appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hinton v.
Maryland State Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-05-1809-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 14,
2005). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -