David Meyers v. Ralph Northam

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6189
DAVID MEYERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GOVERNOR RALPH NORTHAM, Governor of Virginia,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 19-6191
DAVID MEYERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR HAROLD CLARKE; KEITH DAWKINS; GAIL JONES; CENTRAL
CLASSIFICATION SERVICES VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 19-6198
DAVID MEYERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
LITIGATION UNIT; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; GOVERNOR
OF VIRGINIA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION;
SUPERINTENDENT OF THE VIRGINIA STATE POLICE; WISE COUNTY
POLICE DEPARTMENT; WISE COUNTY MAGISTRATE; WISE COUNTY
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY MAGISTRATE;
BRUNSWICK COUNTY MAGISTRATE; TAZEWELL COUNTY
MAGISTRATE; L. GREEN, Brunswick Commonwealth Attorney;
PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY; TAZEWELL
COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY; WISE COUNTY COMMONWEALTH
ATTORNEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge; Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.
(7:18-cv-00473-MFU-RSB; 7:17-cv-00201-GEC-PMS; 7:17-cv-00206-GEC-PMS)
Submitted: June 27, 2019 Decided: July 3, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Meyers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, David Meyers appeals the district court’s orders
denying his postjudgment motion to seal. We have reviewed the record and find no
abuse of discretion. See Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978)
(stating standard of review); In re Application & Affidavit for a Search Warrant, 923 F.2d
324, 326 (4th Cir. 1991) (same). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3