Williams v. Butler

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6116
WILLIE JOE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HUE BUTLER; GEDDES D. ANDERSON; JAMES T.
COURSEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(6:05-cv-01072-DCN)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 31, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Joe Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donna Seegars Givens, WOODS
& GIVENS, LLP, Lexington, South Carolina; Geddes D. Anderson,
Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Willie Joe Williams appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we
grant Williams’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams
v. Butler, No. 6:05-cv-01072-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -