United States v. Hadrick

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7327
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JONATHAN WAYNE HADRICK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR-
92-402)
Submitted: November 5, 2002 Decided: November 22, 2002
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Wayne Hadrick, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Clayton White,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Wayne Hadrick appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), in which he
alleged prosecutorial misconduct in his criminal trial. Hadrick
improperly invoked the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to
collaterally attack a criminal judgment. United States v. O’Keefe,
169 F.3d 281, 289 (5th Cir. 1999) (citing United States v. Mosavi,
138 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1998)). Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2