Bumpus v. Barrett

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6277
RONNIE BUMPUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BRENDA BARRETT; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior
District Judge. (CA-96-4-1)
Submitted: May 28, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Bumpus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-
lief on his Bivens* complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Bumpus v. Barrett, No. CA-96-4-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb.
15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
2