Jack v. Robinson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7580
JAMES L. JACK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden; JANET TERRY, Law
Library Coordinator; SERGEANT FRAME,
Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-00-830-3)
Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: March 10, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James L. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Lee Jack appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) amended complaint for failure to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Jack v. Robinson, No. CA-00-830-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2