United States v. Mark James

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7025 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7025
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK ANTHONY JAMES, a/k/a Shoffer, a/k/a Shoff Dog,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:14-cr-00604-JFA-9)
Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 27, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Anthony James, Appellant Pro Se. Elliott Bishop Daniels, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7025 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mark Anthony James appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. After reviewing the record, we
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying James’ motion.
See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. James, No. 3:14-cr-
00604-JFA-9 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2