Cathy Brentzel v. AIG Property Casualty Company

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2239 Doc: 22 Filed: 10/07/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2239
CATHERINE M. BRENTZEL; ESTATE OF ROBERT C. HACKER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-01055-TSE-MSN)
Submitted: September 16, 2022 Decided: October 7, 2022
Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: James R. Tate, TATE BYWATER, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellants. John F.
O’Connor, Brett Grindrod, STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP, Washington, D.C. for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2239 Doc: 22 Filed: 10/07/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Catherine M. Brentzel and the Estate of Robert C. Hacker appeal the district court’s
order denying their motion to modify the date of the district court’s judgment granting
summary judgment to Appellee on Appellants’ claims, and to extend the time to file an
appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. Brentzel v. AIG Prop. Cas. Co., No. 1:20-cv-01055-TSE-MSN
(E.D. Va. Oct. 15, 2021). We also deny Appellants’ motion to file an addendum to their
brief. See In re Under Seal, 749 F.3d 276, 285 (4th Cir. 2014) (“[A]bsent exceptional
circumstances, . . . we do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal.”). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2