United States v. Pendergrass

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JEROME PENDERGRASS, a/k/a French Fry,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CR-92-216-4)
Submitted: January 31, 2006 Decided: February 14, 2006
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Pendergrass, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Pendergrass appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000) and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Pendergrass, No. CR-92-216-4 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 15, 2005, entered
Feb. 16, 2005; filed and entered June 22, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -