United States v. Phillip Williams

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6361
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Philip James Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley,
Jr., Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Phillip James Williams appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction under Amendment 780 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Williams, No. 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1
(D.S.C. filed Feb. 29, 2016, entered Mar. 1, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2