Petersen v. Rawls

PER CURIAM:

Allan A. Petersen appeals the district court’s order denying his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Petersen v. Rawls, No. CA-03-178-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.