United States v. Betancourt

PER CURIAM:

Wendell Edward Betancourt appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Betancourt, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-JES-5 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.