Kelly v. Fahey

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randolph D. Kelly appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Fahey, No. 1:13-cv-00036-AJT-IDD (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 11, 2013 & entered Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.