United States v. Holton

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenny Montana Holton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Holton, No. 4:98-cr-00009-H-6 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2013). We deny Holton’s motion for clarification.^* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

* We note that Holton has filed in the district court a new motion for reduction of sentence. The district court’s ruling on that motion is not presently before the court.