Winful v. Medical University of South Carolina

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2331
TERESA WINFUL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
GEORGE OHLANDT; CECILE KAMATH, in their official
capacities,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:13-cv-02150-DCN)
Submitted: July 25, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Lewis Mann Cromer, Ryan K. Hicks, J. LEWIS CROMER &
ASSOCIATES, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Bob
J. Conley, Caroline W. Cleveland, CLEVELAND & CONLEY, LLC,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Teresa Winful appeals the district court’s order granting
the Medical University of South Carolina’s summary judgment
motion on Winful’s retaliation and gender and race
discrimination claims, which were brought pursuant to Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e
to 2000e-17 (2012) (Title VII). * We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. Winful v. The Med. Univ. of SC, No.
2:13-cv-02150-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Winful also asserted claims of age discrimination, in
violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967,
as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2015);
discrimination, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012); and
civil conspiracy, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2012).
Winful stipulated to dismissal of these claims.
3