United States v. Barron-Espinosa

PER CURIAM:

Edgardo Barron-Espinosa appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barron-Espinosa, No. 5:13-cr-00259-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 3, 2015).^* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

* To the extent that Barron-Espinosa seeks to appeal from his conviction and sentence imposed on September 4, 2014, because we have previously affirmed this criminal judgment, United States v. Barron-Espinosa, 608 Fed.Appx. 140 (4th Cir.2015), we dismiss the appeal as duplicative and untimely.