United States v. Rose

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dunte Elair Rose appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Rose, No. 5:13-cr-00030-MFU-4 (W.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2016); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir. 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED