Sukhjinder Singh v. Merrick Garland

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2200 Doc: 33 Filed: 04/14/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2200
SUKHJINDER SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: March 30, 2023 Decided: April 14, 2023
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Inna Lipkin, LAW OFFICE OF INNA LIPKIN, Redwood City, California,
for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jonathan
A. Robbins, Assistant Director, Regina Byrd, Civil Division, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2200 Doc: 33 Filed: 04/14/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sukhjinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration
Judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
protection under the Convention Against Torture. After thoroughly reviewing the record,
we are satisfied that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the
administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence
supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re
Singh (B.I.A. Sept. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2