Haranzo v. Virginia Department of Rehabilitative Services

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2351
JOSEPH T. HARANZO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATIVE
SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (CA-05-326-7)
Submitted: April 28, 2006 Decided: May 23, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG,* and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
*
Judge Luttig was a member of the original panel but did not
participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of
the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
Joseph T. Haranzo, Appellant Pro Se. Ishneila G. Moore, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Joseph T. Haranzo appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss in this civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Haranzo v. Virginia Dep’t of Rehabilitative Servs., No. CA-05-326-7
(W.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2005). In addition, we deny Haranzo’s request
for a trial. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -