Thompson v. Novapro Risk Solutions, LP

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2402
WOODROW B. THOMPSON, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NOVAPRO RISK SOLUTIONS, LP; CYNTHIA D. SADLER, Individually
and as Employee and Agent for: NOVA PRO RISK SOLUTIONS, LP;
DIANE SMITH, Individually and as Employee and Agent for:
NOVA PRO RISK SOLUTIONS, LP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:09-cv-01755-WDQ)
Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mercedes C. Samborsky, Joppa, Maryland, for Appellant. Alan S.
Block, A. David Freeman, BONNER KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP,
Washington, D.C.; David A. Rosenberg, FORD & HARRISON, LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Woodrow B. Thompson, III, appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to remand all federal and state
employment discrimination claims to state court. We review de
novo the district court’s denial of the motion to remand. See
Moffitt v. Residential Funding, Co., LLC, 604 F.3d 156, 159 (4th
Cir. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Thompson v. Novapro Risk Solutions, LP, No.
1:09-cv-01755-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2