Kaysan Johnson v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1896 Doc: 36 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1896
KAYSAN JOHNSON, a/k/a Kaysan Johnson-Owens,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FIRST HORIZON HOME LOAN CORPORATION; FIRST HORIZON ASSET
SECURITIES, INC., a/k/a First Horizon National Corporation, a/k/a First Horizon
Home Loan Corporation, A subsidiary of First Horizon Corporation; THE BANK
OF NEW YORK, as Trustee for Securitized Trust: First Horizon Alternative
Mortgage Securities; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
INC., (MERS),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01715-JRR)
Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 24, 2023
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kaysan Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Elizabeth Edwards, Chicago, Illinois, Mary
Zinsner, TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS, LLP, Washington, D.C.;
Melissa O. Martinez, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1896 Doc: 36 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kaysan Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her
removed civil action for failure to state a claim. ∗ See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have
reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. See Fairfax v. CBS Corp., 2 F.4th 286,
291-92 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and discussing plaintiff’s pleading
burden). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Johnson v. First Horizon Home
Loan Corp., No. 1:22-cv-01715-JRR (D. Md. Aug. 18, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗
The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final, appealable order because
the district court dismissed the complaint “without granting leave to amend.” Britt v.
DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 791, 798 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (published order).
2