DocketNumber: 95-50051
Filed Date: 3/26/1996
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 12/21/2014
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-50051 Summary Calendar __________________ GEORGE LYLE, individually and as next friend of four minor children, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (CA-Sa-93-966) ______________________________________________ March 15, 1996 Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The plaintiffs appeal the entry of summary judgment for the defendants in this suit involving Title IX and civil rights claims that stemmed from allegations of molestation of the plaintiffs' four minor children during a school-sponsored event. The appellants' brief does not adequately argue any issue. See Fed. R. App. R. 28(a)(6). None of the arguments are supported by cites to the record. Especially absent are any supporting cites to either * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. the appellants' own summary judgment evidence or the appellees' extensive summary judgment evidence. The lack of supporting record cites in appellants' brief is sufficient, in and of itself, to dismiss the appeal. See Moore v. FDIC,993 F.2d 106
, 107 (5th Cir. 1993). In addition, appellants' brief presents conclusional, unsupported arguments and makes vague claims with respect to matters not before the district court. Finding appellants' brief wholly inadequate, the appeal is dismissed. APPEAL DISMISSED. 2