DocketNumber: 99-21169
Filed Date: 8/11/2000
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-21169 Summary Calendar UHP PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WILCO SUPPLY, INC.; ET AL., Defendants, SPIR STAR DRUCKSCHLÄUCHE GMBH, Defendant-Appellee. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-3166 -------------------- August 10, 2000 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, SMITH, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court must determine whether it has appellate jurisdiction, and the appellants bear the burden of establishing jurisdiction. Acoustic Sys., Inc. v. Wenger Corp.,207 F.3d 287
, 289 (5th Cir. 2000). Federal appellate courts have jurisdiction over appeals only from (1) final orders,28 U.S.C. § 1291
; (2) orders that are deemed final due to jurisprudential exception or which have been properly certified as final pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); and (3) interlocutory orders that fall into specific classes,28 U.S.C. § 1292
(a), or which have been * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-21169 -2- properly certified for appeal by the district court,28 U.S.C. § 1292
(b). Askenase v. LivingWell, Inc.,981 F.2d 807
, 809-10 (5th Cir. 1993). When an action involves multiple parties, any decision that adjudicates the liability of fewer than all of the parties does not terminate the action and is therefore not appealable unless certified by the district court under Rule 54(b). Borne v. A & P Boat Rentals No. 4, Inc.,755 F.2d 1131
, 1133 (5th Cir. 1985); Thompson v. Betts,754 F.2d 1243
, 1245 (5th Cir. 1985). The dismissal of Spir Star Druckschläuche GmbH for lack of personal jurisdiction did not dispose of all the parties, and the district court did not certify that the order was a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b). Further, an interlocutory decree dismissing a party for lack of personal jurisdiction in an admiralty case is not appealable under28 U.S.C. § 1292
(a)(3). Allen v. Okam Holdings, Inc.,116 F.3d 153
, 154 (5th Cir. 1997). The appeal is DISMISSED for this court’s lack of jurisdiction.
Allen v. Okam Holdings, Inc. , 116 F.3d 153 ( 1997 )
Claude Borne v. A & P Boat Rentals No. 4, Inc. , 755 F.2d 1131 ( 1985 )
David Askanase, Trustee v. Livingwell, Inc., Gerald M.H. ... , 981 F.2d 807 ( 1993 )
Wordy Jack Thompson, Jr. v. Judge Charles O. Betts , 754 F.2d 1243 ( 1985 )
Acoustic Systems, Inc. v. Wenger Corp. , 207 F.3d 287 ( 2000 )