DocketNumber: 22-40200
Filed Date: 8/25/2022
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 1/26/2023
Case: 22-40200 Document: 00516447860 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 22-40200 August 25, 2022 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Humberto Cabrera, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:21-CR-747-2 Before Jolly, Jones, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Humberto Cabrera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores,632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Cabrera’s motion for leave to file an out-of-time response is GRANTED, and we have considered his response. The record * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 22-40200 Document: 00516447860 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/25/2022 No. 22-40200 is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Cabrera’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar,739 F.3d 829
, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Cabrera’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Cabrera’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. Wagner,158 F.3d 901
, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). The motion to seal the pro se response and the related motion is GRANTED. 2