United States v. Rolando Rodriguez-Bautista

Case: 16-40335 Document: 00513882817 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-40335
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 21, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ROLANDO RODRIGUEZ-BAUTISTA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:15-CR-1260-1
Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Rolando Rodriguez-Bautista
raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d
303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and
quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Nor is knowledge of
drug type and quantity an element of an offense under either 21 U.S.C. § 952(a)
or 21 U.S.C. § 960(a). See United States v. Valencia-Gonzales, 172 F.3d 344,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 16-40335 Document: 00513882817 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-40335
345-46 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Restrepo-Granda, 575 F.2d 524, 527
(5th Cir. 1978). Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2