DocketNumber: 11-11137
Judges: Reavley, Smith, Prado
Filed Date: 4/25/2012
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
Case: 11-11137 Document: 00511835490 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 25, 2012 No. 11-11137 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk FORREST DESMIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DALLAS FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 4:11-CV-360 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Forrest DeSmit sued his employer under various theories that generally alleged employment discrimination. In a thorough and careful memorandum * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-11137 Document: 00511835490 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2012 No. 11-11137 opinion, the district court dismissed all claims as lacking merit. DeSmit, pro se as in the district court, appeals but does not explain how, in his view, the district court erred. The failure to brief is fatal to any claim. “Because [the plaintiff] has failed to brief any issue, his appeal is frivolous and is dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.” Hawkins v. Woods, No. 11-10731,2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4189
, at *2 (5th Cir. Mar. 1, 2012) (per curiam). This appeal, likewise, is frivolous and subject to dismissal under Rule 42.2. Even if we were to consider the correctness of the judgment, we would affirm on the basis of the district court’s convincing discussion of the issues raised in that court. The appeal is DISMISSED. 2