DocketNumber: 13-30182
Citation Numbers: 573 F. App'x 353
Judges: King, Haynes, Higginson
Filed Date: 6/17/2014
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024
Case: 13-30182 Document: 00512667097 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-30182 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 17, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. YOUNG OKORO ANYANWU, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:10-CR-101-1 Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Young Okoro Anyanwu has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores,632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Anyanwu has filed responses. By unconditionally pleading guilty, Anyanwu waived his right to appeal of the denial of his motion to suppress. See United States v. Sanchez Guerrero, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-30182 Document: 00512667097 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014 No. 13-30182546 F.3d 328
, 331 (5th Cir. 2008). The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Anyanwu’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, invalid guilty plea or waiver; we therefore decline to consider these claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar,739 F.3d 829
, 841 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Corbett,742 F.2d 173
, 176-78 (5th Cir. 1984). We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Anyanwu’s responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2